Image: Automobili Lamborghini S.p.A., official website. The photograph shows a design detail of the current Temerario Spyder and is used only as an illustration. Lamborghini has not released images of Atrevido or Delirio cars and has not announced that such cars exist.
Automobili Lamborghini S.p.A. has filed two European Union word-mark applications for Atrevido and Delirio. Both were submitted on 10 November 2026 and both currently carry the status “Filed”. Atrevido is application 019448056 and Delirio is 019448059. The records establish that Lamborghini wants legal protection for the two words; they do not establish that two new cars are heading for production.
Neither public record contains a body style, platform, powertrain, output, price or unveiling date. The names are not listed in Lamborghini’s official model range and no order book has been announced. The accurate reading is therefore narrow: two potential product names have entered an intellectual-property process, while the products they might identify remain unknown.
What Lamborghini actually filed
TMview identifies Automobili Lamborghini S.p.A. as the applicant in both cases. These are word marks rather than logos or vehicle-design registrations. Each application lists Nice classes 9, 12, 25 and 28. Broadly, those categories cover electronics and software, vehicles, clothing, and games or toys.
Class 12 gives the filings their obvious automotive relevance because it encompasses vehicles and associated products. The other classes are equally instructive. Carmakers routinely protect names across digital products, branded clothing, scale models and collectibles. A multi-class filing can support a complete merchandising programme, but it cannot reveal whether the badge will be attached to a production car, a concept, a limited edition or nothing at all.
The consecutive application numbers and common filing date indicate that the two names were handled together administratively. They do not show a product relationship. The registry does not describe Atrevido and Delirio as two versions of one model, successive projects or market-specific alternatives.
A filed application is not a registered mark
The status matters. “Filed” means the applications have been submitted. A trade mark application is examined and may face observations or opposition before registration. Its appearance in an official database should not be described as a granted registration, and a granted registration would still not amount to approval of a vehicle programme.
Intellectual-property procedure and automotive development are separate tracks. A customer-ready car requires engineering decisions, validation, homologation, industrial capacity, pricing and distribution. None of that appears in these records. A trade mark office deals with commercial signs, not with the technical existence of a prototype or the readiness of a factory.
Manufacturers also file more names than they eventually use. A company may keep an option available, protect itself against third-party use, abandon an application or select a different badge before launch. A filing is useful evidence about names under consideration, but it is not a commitment to buyers.
What the words mean — and what they do not tell us
Atrevido is a Spanish adjective meaning daring or bold. Delirio means delirium in both Italian and Spanish, and can carry a figurative sense of frenzy or intense excitement. Both sound compatible with Lamborghini’s dramatic naming language, but the EU records supply no etymology and no explanation of the company’s intent.
It would be premature to assign either word to a position in the range. There is no official evidence that one is a V12 flagship, a Temerario derivative, an electric model or a special series. The filings also do not document a bull connection. If Lamborghini uses either name, only the manufacturer’s eventual presentation can establish the intended story.
Fenomeno provides a useful contrast. When Lamborghini unveiled that Few-Off model in August 2025, it disclosed the car, its specifications, a production limit of 29 examples and the origin of its name: a brave bull that fought in Morelia in 2002. Atrevido and Delirio currently have none of that product-level evidence. They have only application records.
Where the current range stands
Lamborghini’s official website presents production models including Revuelto, Temerario and Urus SE, alongside limited-run programmes such as Fenomeno. Atrevido and Delirio do not appear in the official model list or configurator as of 13 November 2026.
That absence does not prove that the names will never be used. It establishes only that there is no public launch to verify today. Even when a trade mark is meant for a vehicle, the interval between a protective filing and a reveal can be long, and product plans can change before customers see a car.
Early protection makes practical sense for a global luxury brand. A prospective name must be checked across jurisdictions and product categories. Filing can reduce the risk that another party secures a conflicting right in a relevant field. That explains a brand-management decision; it does not disclose a product plan.
What this means for prospective buyers
There is no official price, deposit, allocation, delivery window or specification sheet for a Lamborghini Atrevido or Delirio. A dealer advertisement or resale listing cannot turn an EU application into a manufacturer-backed offer. Anyone approached about a reservation under either name should verify it directly against Lamborghini’s official communications and authorised sales channels.
Four developments would provide firmer evidence: a change in the EUIPO record, an official Lamborghini release, a model page or configurator entry, and published technical or homologation data. Even registration of the names on its own would still leave the key product questions unanswered.
Until one or more of those events occurs, Atrevido and Delirio belong in Lamborghini’s legal portfolio, not its confirmed showroom line-up. The filings are a specific and verifiable clue about two names the company may want to control. They are not evidence that Lamborghini has confirmed two new supercars.
